**Key Insight:** Alberta data centres are facing a trust issue, not a power problem.
**Body Paragraph 1: Analysis of the market/tech situation**
The article highlights the challenges faced by Alberta data centre operators in gaining community trust due to concerns about water and farmland issues. While technical execution is crucial, it is equally important to build trust from the outset. This is particularly relevant for gas plant operators who rely on off-grid power generation and
cryptocurrency mining operations.
**Body Paragraph 2: The specific operational implication**
For gas plant operators, building trust with local communities is essential for ensuring reliable and sustainable energy supply. Without early community confidence, technical readiness doesn’t convert into project momentum. Therefore, operators need to invest in transparent water disclosures, local workforce commitments, and public-facing power plans to build trust and ensure long-term success.
**GasGx Take:** Our GasGx
LCOE Calculator can help operators accurately forecast their Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) for various scenarios, including those involving community engagement and trust-building initiatives. By using our tool, operators can gain a better understanding of the financial implications of different strategies and make informed decisions that align with their goals.
**Recommended SEO Tags:** "Alberta Data Centres", "Trust Issues", "Power Problems", "Community Engagement", "Project Development"
# Context / Input Data
Title: Alberta Data Centres Face Trust Issues, Not Power Problems | Brett W. posted on the topic | LinkedIn
<
>
Alberta data centres don’t have a power problem first. They have a trust problem first.Rocky View County rejected the Kineticor/eStruxture campus in September 2025 — not because the power plan was weak, but because 50+ residents showed up to a 10-hour hearing with unresolved concerns about water and farmland.The technical file was ready.*The community file wasn’t.*The developers moving fastest in Alberta treat social license as critical path, not a checkbox. That means:*Plain-language water narrative before the AUC filingA power plan that explains where energy comes from — and whyLocal upside people can picture: jobs, heat reuse, tax base, training pathwaysOlds is a useful counter-example.The developer went door-to-door to ~200 homes before council voted.~95% came back neutral or supportive. Council approved the land-use change.Technical execution still matters. But without early community confidence, technical readiness doesn’t convert into project momentum.For people who’ve worked major infrastructure files: what builds trust fastest in month 1 — transparent water disclosures, local workforce commitments, or a public-facing power plan?#DataCenters #AlbertaEnergy #CommunityEngagement #ProjectDevelopment
